Sign Up for the Daily Filmfodder Newsletter       

Sci-Fi News and Reviews

Tonight On SciFi Friday - "The Doctor" Is In

Dr Who

While "Battlestar Galactica," "Stargate SG-1" and "Stargate Atlantis" are on break, the SciFi Channel is betting on "Doctor Who" to keep viewers watching.

Tonight the cable channel will air the two-hour premiere of the BBC series. It's been throwing little bits of info about the show and its stars at us all week to peek our interest.

The series introduces us to the ninth incarnation of The Doctor.

According to the SciFi Channel, Russell T. Davies, executive producer and lead writer of the new "Doctor Who," attributed much of the show's initial success to the winning chemistry between Christopher Eccleston ("28 Days Later"), who plays the eccentric Time Lord, and Billie Piper ("Spirit Trap"), who plays his companion, Rose Tyler.

Eccleston didn't stick around for the second season, though. David Tennant has taken up the task as the tenth incarnation of the good Doctor. Production of the second season is underway in the UK with a rumored air date of April 15th on the BBC.

I've never been a huge "Who" fan. I didn't find Tom Baker (the fourth Doctor) and that horrid scarf of his very appealing. Since it was all that seemed to air when I was a kid (very young - I was very young at the time! and they were reruns!), I just didn't get in to the show. When the fifth Doctor came around, the whole thing didn't make a lot of sense to me so I just stuck to reruns of the original "Battlestar Galactica" (when Richard Hatch was Apollo) and "Buck Rogers." Perhaps now - six Doctors later - I might give "Who" another try.

With my beloved "Battlestar" on break until October (ack!) and "SG-1" and "Atlantis" gone until July, I'll set my TiVo for "Who" to fill the void. I doubt I'll watch it live, though. Heck, it's Saint Patty's Day! I'm not supposed to be sitting home anyway - or something.

"Doctor Who" airs tonight on SciFi at 9pm ET/8pm CT after a re-run of "SG-1." If you're recording it, note that the "two-hour premiere" is listed as two episodes ("Rose" and "The End of the World") so be sure to get them both. --Shannon Nolley


Posted by Shannon on March 17, 2006 8:31 AM
Permalink | Email to a Friend | Add to del.icio.us | Digg This





Sure, everyone's entitled to their opinions. But those who didn't like the Doctor Who of old should be fed lima beans with a stash of rabbit lettuce on the side.

The thing that bothers me most is that special effects matter most to viewers. This leaves little for the imagination. The old Doctor Who series managed to take stories as a priority. This, thankfully, continues well into the new series airing on the Sci-Fi Channel. (I still can't stand that abbreviation, sci-fi).

Everyone seems to make fun as the poke at the old shows. They say it's cheesy, whatever that means. They complain about "wobbly" sets. I've seen every single show and have most on DVD and tape. I never saw a wobbly set. Cheap, yes. But not wobbly.

I look foward to seeing the new series on Sci-Fi and it feels like they're giving the series a pretty good chance. Even though I've seen the shows already on DVD. Very, very few shows center on a character who has a dislike for using weapsons. That is a nice change instead of those bumbling idiots who think everything should be resolved by shooting up the storm with big guns.

For the record, Battlestar Galactica and Stargate of today are some of the most godawful shows on TV.


-- Posted by: kmpaters at March 20, 2006 1:16 PM

Yum! Lima beans!

Ok. I'll bite, what ARE a few good sci-fi shows currently on TV, then?

-- Posted by: Shannon at March 20, 2006 1:32 PM

That's a pretty good question. Not much comes to mind. TV is like a vast wastland for science-fictions ideas. It's a very empty space. I'm still wracking my head over this one.
I'm tempted to say Carnivale, but that's more like horror/fantasy. Plus it's currently not on TV anymore.
I'd like to add The Eleventh Hour with Patrick Stewart that was shown in England. But that was cancelled already. And I haven't seen it yet. It's based more on science-fact. Like X-Files without the weirdness.
Science-fiction hasn't had very many good outings on television: S-F and TV has long enjoyed a bad relationship together. If it were movies, then I'd say Seconds and Brazil were excellent forway into the S-F realm.
Watching TV is like sticking your finger in a light socket. You know you're going to get a bad buzz out of it.

-- Posted by: kmpaters at March 21, 2006 2:03 PM

I liked the scarf!

-- Posted by: kmpaters at March 21, 2006 9:24 PM

Heh. Don't really agree about the sci-fi on TV, but I LOVE the analogy! The buzz - bad or otherwise - is true. I love horror for the roller coaster factor, so why not?

If there's something you think is hot that I should report on, please let me know! I'm always looking for new stuff to fodder.

And the scarf... ok, maybe it was the hair I didn't like. Now that I'm back in a cold climate I appreciate scarves more. ;)

-- Posted by: shannon at March 21, 2006 10:02 PM

For those interested in the Doctor Who series, there is a full box set version coming to the likes of Best Buy stores on July 4 this year.

I do feel like a smug bastard when I see it on Sci-Fi Channel already. I shouldn't. But I do.

This might surprise, but I am doing something very similar to you. I do blogs on everything science fiction for the newspaper I write for. But I'd like to figure out how to place pictures on the blog the same way you do.

Now, I must going back to my Police Call Box for a bit of a timetravel spin back to 1979 to see the punk revolution in its peak.

-- Posted by: K. M. Paters at March 22, 2006 1:09 PM

More Recent Stories:
"Pushing Daisies" Cancelled
"Twilight"
Expectations
The 2008 Election
National Novel Writing Month
Best Vampire
"Sarah Connor" & "Knight Rider" Get Full Season Orders
"Galactica" Return Date Set!
"Crusoe"
Ratings Update